Do you own the “junk bond” fund of the silver industry?
You know, the fund that has numerous structural risks that could easily blow up in a crisis…
The one that admits it may be unable to acquire sufficient physical silver for the fund…
Concedes its share price may not always match the silver price…
As bad as all that is, there’s something else you need to know about SLV and other bullion ETFs…
It’s something few investors are aware of, but if you’re an investor who wants to maximize their profit you need to know.
Because it will, without a doubt, reduce how much you’ve earned by the time you sell…
The Hidden Way SLV Steals Value
Most investors are aware that ETFs charge a management fee, and this includes bullion funds. For SLV the “sponsor fee” is 0.5% per year.
We also charge a fee for , which is slightly higher. It covers storage, , auditing and reporting. But with ours you have real metal, in name, not theirs, and stored outside the banking system, not inside it.
But since SLV is slightly cheaper, it might seem like it offers a better value.
But in reality, SLV offers value. In the long run, you will earn less investing in it and other bullion ETFs. Here’s how…
SLV and its ilk deduct their fee by That’s why when you look up the price of SLV and GLD you’ll see it’s not at spot—not even close, actually. That’s because they’ve been reducing the amount of metal each year by selling some to pay themselves.
Here’s what that has looked like over time…
SLV began trading on April 28, 2006. Since then, they’ve deducted 0.5% of the metal that investors originally had exposure to in order to pay management fees. Every year.
So from 2006 to present, here’s how much metal exposure the investor has lost on a 1,000-share purchase, vs. a bullion holder that bought 1,000 of physical metal.
From 2006 to April of this year, the SLV investor has seen their exposure to silver reduced by 75 ounces on their 1,000-share investment!
If you bought 2,000 shares of SLV, you have 150 fewer ounces working for you. If you purchased 10,000 shares you have a whopping 750 fewer ounces working for you.
But if you held physical silver you maintained exposure to your 1,000 ounces the entire time.
You might counter,
Yes, but you still lose with SLV, because . If one pays the fees from cash instead of metal, that investor has metal working for them.
And that makes a big difference, because…
More Metal = More Earning Power
Gold and silver don’t pay dividends, but they still have earning power. And if you have more metal, you earn more—if you have less metal, you obviously earn less.
Here’s why that matters in a rising price environment…
Let’s say silver goes to $50 this year, $100 next year, and $150 in 2023 (these are examples, not predictions).
For the investor who bought 1,000 shares in SLV last year, here’s how much less they would earn in this scenario, vs. what bullion holders would earn if they didn’t lose metal to fees and instead paid cash.
Bullion holders would earn $500, $1,500, and $3,000 MORE over the next three years than SLV holders. On 1,000 ounces.
If you own 2,000 ounces, you’d earn $6,000 more if silver hit $150 in 2023. If you own 10,000 ounces you’d earn a whopping $30,000 more. The differences are more striking if you think the silver price is headed higher.
But for the SLV investor who bought in 2006, the missed profits really add up: on just a 1,000 share purchase back in 2006, they would earn $62,750 LESS if silver hit $150 in 2023. And a 10,000 share purchase would amount to a stunning $627,500 less in profit!
For those that might claim your net worth is still lower with bullion than SLV—after all, you pay a fee one way or the other—focus on earning power: the more silver you own, the more profit you’ll make in a rising price environment. Buying SLV locks you into earning less.
Do you want to earn more by the time you sell?
Then buy real silver, not some paper representation that pays itself by taking metal away from you. Assuming it’s even still functioning properly.